Finally, we caught the biggest fish so far… and the government wants him pardoned?
Not to be superfluous about it, but this Arroyo administration has shamelessly proven to be the spineless, pathetic, unprincipled wimp that it already is. If Gloria and her cohorts continue to publicly brandish this impudent proposal to a convicted plunderer; she certainly is making sure that whatever modicum of credibility and benevolence left in her government would easily dissipate in the heat of the recent ZTE scandal.
In light of the allegations pointing to such reprehensibly large scale corruption in her government, GMA might have just pushed the panic button and prematurely dangled this offer for pardon to Erap. Why premature? The president could only legally grant pardon after conviction by final judgment. If so - why the rush?
The motive is obviously egoistic; the paranoia, evident. GMA still fears Erap and his rabid supporters. She fears another attempt at power-grab. The saneness of her fears, I think, is directly proportioned to the enormity of her transgressions, heavy impedimenta she could no longer handle and conceal, much less defend, when no longer in power.
It should be remembered that, prior to the promulgation, Erap was intrepid in his cold refusal to any offer of pardon (but now, he sings a different tune!), and his firm resolve to elevate his case to the Supreme Court. Until the conviction is rendered final by the High Court, no pardon can be granted by the President. Any move to do so is downright unconstitutional.
Section 19, Art. VII of the 1987 Constitution states very succinctly that: “Except in cases of impeachment or as otherwise provided in this Constitution, the President may grant reprieves, commutations, and pardons, and remit fines and forfeitures, after conviction by final judgment. x x x”.
I almost puked when one of her cabinet members, I think it was Ronaldo Puno, who, with all temerity, dared to say that despite the clear wording of the constitutional provision, a pardon might as well be granted, and leave it to the Supreme Court to determine its constitutionality. In the meanwhile, Erap would be free to enjoy Christmas.
I also cringe at the Pecksniffian bravado persistently shown by the so-called anti-Arroyo oppositionists, whose dalliance with Erap at one time or another, so far has left them unusually cold toward this issue. I have yet to hear their trademark screaming condemnation of this proposal for an Erap pardon. Where are you people?!!! Don’t you realize that if we deny Erap pardon; it would send a strong message to GMA that no such kind of impunity would ever be afforded to her if found guilty of a crime, and to all other future erring leaders as well?
The needless debates on whether the pardon should be absolute or conditional only add to the absurdity of it all. It is a non-issue. Whether absolute or conditional pardon is given; it does not in any way reverse the fact that Erap was CONVICTED of a crime. The issue should simply be – whether a pardon (in whatever form) be granted or not.
I must say that an Erap pardon would be the ultimate mockery of our justice system – it tells the people in no uncertain terms that here in our country - what we have is selective justice.
That we only fry the small fry, and we throw the big fish back into the waters.
That if you are rich, powerful, and influential, you can commit the most heinous of crimes – with utter impunity.
Join my call. NO PARDON FOR ERAP.
Wow, nice theme! Sorry, had to say it.
Anyway, I think it was GMA’s plan to pardon Erap all along. If you put it in that perspective, it all makes sense. Otherwise, it makes no sense at all.
Posted by RT Cunningham at September 27, 2007, 12:12 amusc 93, so what is your position? all right with you if erap is pardoned? i don’t see the point why arroyo’s sins be made as an excuse to pardon erap. this is not a case of arroyo vs. erap, i see this simply as a case against erring leaders whether gloria or erap. If we pardon erap now are we are making a convenient precedent for gloria, that in case she gets convicted too, then she gets pardoned all the same?
rt, whatever plan GMA had is irrelevant at this point. if you see it as nothing more than a political plan; its nothing to be appreciated. she is just concerned of her political survival. in the meantime, people would see that there are two standards of justice: one for the poor, and the other, for the rich and influential.
Posted by siu at September 27, 2007, 9:22 am“Mockery of our justice system”: strong words, and you hammer that nail right on its head. Yet, if I may add, isn’t mocking our justice system a fairly common practice in the Philippines, specially - and I could not agree with you more - when the big fish are involved? Indeed, if Erap successfully avoids the frying pan, we might as well think that justice in the Philippines is dead. Maybe not totally. Almost.
Yet, if I may ask you, my friend, who’s responsibility is it to ensure that this mockery will not continue? Honestly, I can’t answer this question my self. But somehow, this must end. And, hopefully, we could see this happen in our lifetime.
NO PARDON FOR ERAP.
Posted by Emerson at September 27, 2007, 9:40 amemerson, what would the president do with the other co-accused like Jaime Dichaves, eleuterio tan, etc in the plunder case, if they get caught? Pardon them too? or allow them to rot in jail while the master is set free? Is that justice? How about that first Filipino who got convicted of plunder? Other than not being a former presidnet, what is the difference between them?
thnks for joining the call.
it is very frustrating for us ordinary citizens to hear all these brouhahas you know? Why not hire an assasin to kill all these corrupt officials in the government?
no matter how much effort all these trial lawyers do, nothing will be done much in alleviating the sufferings of ordinary people like me.
Whatever happened to the famous Latin proverb, “Fiat justitia, ruat coelum”? It’s really a shame to the government and to the justice system if Erap gets pardoned. Not only it undermines the lawyers who work diligently with the case but it also discourages them from pursuing future cases like these. I know this is not the first where money and influence towers over justice, I guess the best we could do is to shut up and put up or SPEAK UP! I choose the latter; so NO PARDON FOR ERAP.
“Let justice be done, though the heaven’s fall.”
Posted by richard at September 30, 2007, 4:44 amRichard, that latin legal phrase is very apt indeed; sadly, its now seemed made obsolete by the pragmatist stance of our present government, and the culture of impunity that plagued the system.
The US Supreme Court has this motto: “Equal Justice Under Law”. If Erap is pardoned, I wonder how this would apply.
thanks chard.
Posted by siu at September 30, 2007, 10:09 pmLev, thats kinda taking it to the extreme - although our level of frustrations definitely would get to us to entertain and agree to such an unsettling idea. Speaking of which, we hear assassins from the left, they’re called “sparrow units” I believe. I have yet to hear of big name personalities being made their targets
Why don’t we call Judge Dredd instead?
It’s sad, not that i’m against Erap’s conviction but because i know that our justice system is “political patronage”. That those who are out of favor from those in power are prosecuted while those in their circle are shielded by the law. I just hope that not only the poor Erap is convicted but ALL those guilty of graft & corruption…
Posted by astrid at October 3, 2007, 11:29 amastrid - agree, agree.
Posted by siu at October 3, 2007, 10:43 pmwell, shit.
.
.
.
.
the long reaction can be found on my blog. ^_^
Posted by liz at October 26, 2007, 10:58 amThere is an old saying “People get the leaders that they deserve.” rings so true at this moment.
Posted by Yang at October 27, 2007, 8:58 amyang, couldn’t agree with you more. this is a consequence that we have to collectively suffer. i just hope that we as a people collectively learn from this lesson and elect better leaders.
the problem is, so few good men run for office, and if they do, they lose to the more popular or to monied politicians.
Posted by siu at October 27, 2007, 12:03 pmAll comments are moderated. Your comments will not appear here unless approved by the blog owner. Thank you.
my friend all presidents are corrupt it just that erap was betrayed by his close friend chavit. look at arroyo she has so many scandals but fortunate for her nobody from her circle of friends and associates betrayed her. maybe she’s good at giving favors to them that they keep their silence. to silence the opposition which erap leads that’s the bargaining power of glo. this is what glo would tell erap “PASU or KULFOR” HAHAHA
Posted by usc 93 at September 26, 2007, 8:19 pm